MOSSKIN
SIGNALS OF HEAVY METALS
An interactive narrative about sensing invisible toxic signals.
"To sense the invisible is to bear the weight of a silent reality."
Story: Mosskin
// Follow the toxic signals. Your choice—equip the device or walk unprotected—will lead to different futures.
INITIATE SEQUENCE
Narrative Architecture
Unseen Risks
1.mp4 - Hidden danger (click to play)
With Device
2A.mp4 - Sensing signals
Without Device
2B.mp4 - Unprotected
In the Wake
3.mp4 - Reflection (click to play)
The Moss Device
// A bio-digital interface for detecting environmental toxicity.
The Moss Device integrates living biomatter with digital sensors. It acts as an external organ, translating invisible heavy metal concentration levels into haptic and visual feedback for the wearer.
-
Visual Feedback
Real-time color shifts indicating toxicity levels.
-
Bio-Sensing
Moss cultures react to atmospheric heavy metals.
-
Haptic Warning
Vibration patterns alert wearer of high density zones.
"Walking through the industrial district, the device begins to pulse. The moss chamber glows a cautionary amber. You realize the air you are breathing is laden with lead dust from the old factory."
Research & Mapping
// Deconstructing the invisible network of heavy metal pollution.
Inspiration & Background
2022 Consumer Reports on dark chocolate lead levels. The journey of heavy metals in the ecosystem.
Ecological & Human Impacts
Neurotoxicity, bioaccumulation, and skeletal damage caused by Cd, Pb, and Hg.
Signals: Past, Present, Future
Mapping the visibility of pollution. From visible smog to invisible chemical threats.
Multi-Dimensional Impacts
Ecological, Technological, Social, Cultural, Political, and Economical impacts.
Pollution History
Four stages from 1950s hidden accumulation to future symbiotic governance.
Why Moss?
Moss as bio-indicator. Creating perceptible interfaces for invisible data.
Reflection
// Two paths, one reality. The choice defines our future sensitivity.
With Device / Choosing Awareness
By choosing to wear the device, we are accepting a kind of responsibility. It does not remove toxicity from our lives, but it allows us to see what we usually cannot see.
Awareness here is not just about information — it is about recognising that our bodies and the environment are already connected in ways we often ignore.
The moss becomes a reminder of that connection. It responds to the world more honestly than we do. Through it, the invisible becomes visible, and this visibility pushes us toward more careful and ethical decisions.
This choice is not about fear. It is about allowing ourselves to stay present with what is real.
Without Device / Remaining Numb
Choosing not to use the device may feel easier. Silence can feel like safety, and not knowing seems to protect us from anxiety.
But toxicity continues whether we acknowledge it or not. The body absorbs what the world gives it. Numbness delays discomfort, but it does not change the long-term reality.
This path reflects a familiar human tendency: we often prefer comfort over confrontation. Yet the cost of this comfort slowly builds inside us — a quiet surrender to environmental harm that remains unspoken.
Reflection / Beyond the Two Choices
Mosskin is not designed to tell us which path is correct. Instead, it reveals something deeper: both choices exist within the same polluted world.
The question is not “device or no device.” The real question is how we choose to live when the environment is already part of our bodies, and when our bodies are quietly recording what the world has done.
In this sense, Mosskin is not a solution. It is a way of paying attention. It makes slow harm perceptible, and invites us to rethink what it means to care for ourselves when the boundary between inside and outside is no longer clear.
Awareness is not a cure, but it may be the first step toward refusing indifference.
“This project is not a machine that fixes toxicity, but a device that helps us recognise how deeply we are shaped by it.”
It asks one simple question:
When harm becomes invisible, what does it take for us to notice it again — and what kind of future does that noticing make possible?